Obama’s Muslim America

June 3, 2009

President Obama, in the first of many attempts to suck up to the Middle Eastern nations he’s currently attempting to court with his golden tongue, has declared America to be one of the largest Muslim countries in the world.

I’m not even sure where to begin with this. First off, I suppose, is the fact that it’s not even remotely true. But that’s really sort of beside the point.

Most importantly, when one thinks of a “Muslim nation” the image that springs to mind is a nation where the citizenry is a) Muslim, and b) governed by Muslim beliefs. So far, at least, we’re not there or even approaching the runway. We may need to reassess after this grovel-fest is over, but for now it’s safe to say that if there were 200 million Muslims living in America, and America was still governed with freedom of religion and a separation between Church and state, then we would still not be a Muslim nation. We would be a nation with a large Muslim population. The single largest ethnic group in America are whites, but this is not a “White nation,” despite the handwringing of race pimps like Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson. A better case can be made to say that America is a Judeo-Christian nation because America was established as a nation of laws, and those laws were based solidly in the Judaic and Christian philosophies.

So the question becomes, “Why did Obama say this?”

I’m leaning on the idea that this guy is nowhere near as smart as we all thought he was. Clearly he’s got an amazing ability to absorb facts and data and retain them, and his skill with a prepared text is unmatched by any politician I’ve seen. But unlike Bill Clinton, who had the same abilities, I don’t really see Barack Obama as any kind of intellectual heavyweight. His ideas are really just the same lefty rhetoric that we’ve been hearing since the 1960s.

Let’s take a look at the whole interview he did with France’s Canal Plus:

  • He refers to the loss of the Air France jet as “an aviation problem.”
  • He insists that Muslims need to understand how we in the West feel about terrorism. I assume he means that we don’t want to be attacked anymore, as if he believes that Muslims thought that we were really hoping they’d kill thousands of our citizens one beautiful Tuesday morning. In the spirit of moral equivalency, he also states that the West has to “educate themselves more effectively on Islam.” Someone’s crying, Lord…come on, sing it with me! You know the words!
  • He offers really jejune statements like “those who build as opposed to those who destroy I think leave a lasting legacy,” a sentiment that is so simplistic it borders on feeble-minded and is also very debatable (so Stalin, Hitler, and Mao did not leave lasting legacies? Oh…he meant good legacies…well then, yeah, duh…unless you count things like destroying colonial rule in America, or destroying the South to free the slaves, or destroying Berlin to eradicate the Nazi movement, or destroying the Berlin Wall, or, well, never mind). It was the kind of a hollow, yet lofty, line that sounds really impressive when you’re in high school and you think your teacher is way cool.
  • He thinks that his speech and “a roundtable discussion” are the stepping off point for getting Muslim extremists to lay down their knives and relinquish control back to the pilots.
  • He says Muslim nations are making “investments in education” as if what children are being taught in many of these Wahabbi schools is not part of the problem.
  • He believes that France (!) is one of the countries leading the way on climate change and the economic recession. Well, it’s good to know that he’s taking climate advice from a country that saw thousands of people die in a heat wave in 2003 and economic advice from a Socialist country that had double-digit unemployment and anemic economic growth for years before the economic collapse.
  • When asked what he likes about France, he at least has the decency to stop and think before falling back on the food and the wine.

The entire interview should be subtitled “One President In Search Of A Teleprompter.”

But the saddest part of all of this, to me at least, is that Obama’s overseas trips from Europe to South America to the Middle East, infested with moral equivalency and mea culpas, reveal the President of the United States to be a man who is embarrassed by his own country. That is truly a shame.


Sonia’s Misspoken Speech

June 2, 2009

Over at National Review and in his syndicated column, Rich Lowry does a nice job of dismantling the claim from the Administration and Left-wing blogs that Sonia Sotomayor “misspoke” when she claimed that Latino women are better judges than white men.


President Chamberlain

June 2, 2009

Dateline 1938: American President Neville Chamberlain told the world today that Germany has a serious problem with insects and other pests and that they should be allowed to produce the pesticide Zyklon-B, on the condition that they swear on a stack of Bibles that they won’t use it for anything bad.

When asked for a comment, German Chancellor Hitler responded, “Jah, we promise. We will use it only to kill pests.”

President Chamberlain hailed the promise as a great victory and promised even more examples of lofty rhetoric producing peace in our time.

When asked what would happen if Germany were to use the pesticide against, say, Jews, President Chamberlain promised condemnation and, possibly, “a strongly-worded letter of criticism from the League Of Nations.”


The Murder Of George Tiller

June 1, 2009

I will state first and foremost that I don’t believe George Tiller was a good man. He was not merely a doctor who provided abortions. He was a pro-abortion zealot who pursued his cause relentlessly.

This does not mean that his murder was not a great evil. It was.

The number of pro-life advocates who plant bombs or shoot doctors is so small it barely registers in any real sense, despite the hype and the desires of the Left to portray pro-lifers as drooling, troglodytic, mouth-breathing Christians. My God, the horror! Christians!

Pro-lifers have made great strides in recent years (a recent Gallup poll indicates that for the first time a majority of Americans consider themselves pro-life). These great strides have come because the pro-life argument is being backed up by advances in science and the strength of principled convictions. The argument is not being won by murder or terrorism, and it never will be.

The abortions that George Tiller performed are something that he will have to answer for in the next life. His murderer will have to answer for his equally great sins.

The Left in this country will no doubt rush to the fore to denounce pro-lifers as being the same type of Right-wing extremists that Homeland Secretary Janet Napolitano warned about. The fact that this is a lie and a gross misrepresentation of the beliefs of tens of millions of people across this great country is irrelevant. The insane murder of George Tiller puts an arrow in the political quiver of the pro-abortion movement, and they will use it. Pro-lifers must resist the temptation to play politics. I hope the man who killed him spends the rest of his life in prison, but that will never return the man to the family who loved him and who he loved. George Tiller is dead. R.I.P.


The Disgusting Charlie Rangel

June 1, 2009

Whenever I think Charlie Rangel, the U.S. Representative from Harlem, has hit a new low in public discourse (which is every time I hear him or see him), he manages to lower the bar even more. He’s a disgraceful old cow who really needs to be put out to pasture.

The other night there was a terrible accident in New York. An off-duty police officer found some punk trying to break into his car. The cop pulled his gun and pursued the punk. During the pursuit, another cop intervened. Without knowing the situation, he ordered the off-duty cop to stop and drop his gun. Instead, the off-duty officer turned to the cop with gun in hand and compounded his error by not identifying himself as a cop. The end result was that a cop killed another cop. So stupid and senseless, this was a tragic accident that will change the lives of everyone involved in it.

This is New York. Enter the race hustlers. You see, the off-duty officer who was killed, Omar Edwards, was black. The police officer who shot him, Andrew Dunton, was white.

The disgusting Charlie Rangel then made a comment when asked about what President Obama should do on his “date” in New York. Rangel advised the President not to “run around East Harlem unidentified.” In Rangel’s world, the Secret Service is the one thing protecting the President of the United States from being capped by rogue white police officers who randomly shoot black men on the street. Think I’m exaggerating?

“If [he] did not have the Secret Service . . . around him, [city cops] wouldn’t know if he was president of the United States.”

Now, Rangel has apologized. Sort of.

He now says that it was inappropriate to mention the President in his statement about the shooting. But he maintains that the police officers need better training (i.e., sensitivity training, I’m sure) and called on the Justice Department to “review the problems in the New York City Police Department when black officers are killed by whites, which too often is the case.”

So the closest we’ll get to an apology from this pig is to say that he shouldn’t have mentioned the President of the United States when he was only trying to call attention to the dozens, or hundreds, or is it thousands? of black police officers that are ruthlessly shot to death by white police officers every day in Harlem. Right?

Will somebody please tell this tax-cheating, corrupt, Commie-loving excuse for a man to shut the hell up?