Profile In Courage: Obama In Japan

November 16, 2009

On his recent visit to Japan, Barack Obama was asked the same question every American president is asked when they go to Japan. “President Obama, you are a proponent of a nuclear free world, and you’ve stated first of all that you would like to visit Hiroshima and Nagasaki while in office. Do you have this desire, and what is your understanding of the historical meaning of the A-bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki? Do you think it was the right decision?” The reporter followed this immediately with a question about North Korea.

The answer is really pretty simple. “The bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki was an unfortunate, but necessary, action. It brought a brutal war to a swift conclusion and saved millions of lives, both American and Japanese, that would have been lost in an invasion of the Japanese homeland.”

But that would be asking too much from the Groveler-in-Chief. Here’s how he answered:

With respect to nuclear weapons and the issues of non-proliferation, this is an area where Prime Minister Hatoyama and I have discussed repeatedly in our meetings. We share, I think, a vision of a world without nuclear weapons. We recognize, though, that this is a distant goal, and we have to take specific steps in the interim to meet this goal. It will take time. It will not be reached probably even in our own lifetimes. But in seeking this goal we can stop the spread of nuclear weapons; we can secure loose nuclear weapons; we can strengthen the non-proliferation regime.

As long as nuclear weapons exist, we will retain our deterrent for our people and our allies, but we are already taking steps to bring down our nuclear stockpiles and — in cooperation with the Russian government — and we want to continue to work on the non-proliferation issues.

Now, obviously Japan has unique perspective on the issue of nuclear weapons as a consequence of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. And that I’m sure helps to motivate the Prime Minister’s deep interest in this issue. I certainly would be honored, it would be meaningful for me to visit those two cities in the future. I don’t have immediate travel plans, but it’s something that would be meaningful to me.

Okay, and your answer would be…?

The Japanese reporter then repeated the question, asking if it “was right” for the U.S. to drop the atomic bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Maybe there will be an answer this time.

No, there were three sets of questions, right? You asked about North Korea?

No answer for you! Obama then went on to talk about North Korea.

I can only hazard a guess as to why this hanging curve ball was ignored by the President. My guess, and it is just that, is that an honest answer from Obama would have been yet another apology, this time to the people of Japan. But unlike his mealy-mouthed whimperings to the Arab world, an American apology for Hiroshima and Nagasaki would have been big news. Maybe even MSNBC would have covered it. Worse, it would have been very bad news for a President that’s looking more and more like an ineffectual weakling on the world stage. It’s one thing for Obama to go before our enemies and apologize for American arrogance (always in the past, never in B.O.’s America). It’s another thing entirely to apologize for something the vast majority of Americans are glad we did.

My guess is that Obama’s no student of history, that his knowledge of America’s past comes straight out of Howard Zinn’s America-bashing A People’s History of the United States, with a bit of Noam Chomsky thrown in for good measure. He probably feels that the bombing of the Japanese cities was somehow a great moral error because his gut instinct is to be “opposed” to nuclear weapons and to believe that America is usually in the wrong (at least, up until January 20th, 2009). He’s politcally savvy enough to know that his views aren’t shared by the proles who voted him into office, however, so he artlessly dodged the question twice.

One can only wonder what “Give ’em Hell” Harry Truman would say about such an obsequious poseur in the White House.

Hot Air has more, and Real Clear Politics has video of the whole exchange.


NY-23: Not Over Yet?

November 12, 2009

This probably won’t have any bearing on the final outcome, but it’s still fascinating: recounting the votes in the NY-23 Congressional district is cutting Bill Owens lead significantly. So much so that there is a slight chance Doug Hoffman could actually win.


Obama At The Berlin Wall: Ich Bin Ein Great!

November 12, 2009

A few days have passed since the twentieth anniversary of the fall of the Berlin Wall, so I know I’m not the first to comment on this but it’s been nagging at me for days. I still vividly remember hearing the news that day when I got home from work. That night I sat and watched the live feed from Berlin, with thousands of happy Germans attacking the wall with chisels and hammers, pouring champagne, and revelling in the joy of freedom and the prospects of a united Germany. It was unlike anything I’d ever seen before: so many people, oppressed for so long, suddenly breathing the air of liberty. It was as if people trapped on the bottom of the ocean were suddenly allowed to breathe the air again.

It was the right thing to do for the President of the United States to address such an auspicious event, but once again Barack Obama failed miserably.

The Berlin Wall was the single biggest symbol of the Cold War between the free nations of the world and the Soviet Union. The Cold War was not a bad dream that we woke up from. The Soviet Union murdered tens of millions of people, imprisoned millions more, and crushed free nations under the jackboot of tyranny. In East Germany, the Stasi secret police were notorious for their spying on innocent citizens, and crushing any dissent from the ruling party. Poland, East Germany, Czechoslovakia, Hungary…these are just some of countries that were held in the vice-like grip of totalitarianism by Mother Russia was long. Russia’s errors spread throughout the world, to China, Korea, Viet Nam, Cuba, Yugoslavia. The Soviet Union was not America’s competition; they were America’s enemy.

It started badly with an introduction by Hilary Clinton who said that Barack Obama “represents the fall of different kinds of walls.” You know it had to go downhill after that push.

It would have been nice for Barack Obama to acknowledge the crimes against humanity committed in the Soviet Union and in East Germany, but during the course of his video presentation, he mentioned the “Iron Curtain” only once, and did not mention Russia or the Soviet Union at all. Nor did he mention the man most credited with winning the Cold War: Ronald Reagan, who famously stood at the wall and loudly demanded, “Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall!” He did not mention Margaret Thatcher, who stood shoulder-to-shoulder with Reagan in her fierce condemnations of the Evil Empire. He did not mention Pope John Paul II, the Pope who came from a Communist country, and who traveled back to his home country of Poland and spoke of liberty, and embraced Solidarity, the fledgling union that was then in its infancy but eventually came to symbolize the yearning for freedom throughout the Soviet bloc.

But Obama did give a shout out to his favorite person in the whole world: himself.

“Few would have foreseen … that a united Germany would be led by a woman from Brandenburg or that their American ally would be led by a man of African descent. But human destiny is what human beings make of it,” Obama said.

The list of crimes against humanity perpetrated by the Soviet Union includes mass murder, unjust imprisonment, genocide, re-education camps, unjust war. But the fall of this Evil Empire has been reduced by the Megalomaniac-in-Chief to paving the way for a woman to succeed in Germany and a black man to succeed in America.

I remember watching those Germans chipping away at the wall with tears of joy streaming down their faces. What I don’t remember is thinking, “This paves the way for a man of African descent to lead America.” But for Barry, it’s all about him.

Hot Air has a whole wrap-up, with video.


Terrorism At Fort Hood; UPDATED

November 5, 2009

The news is reporting that 12 are dead and 31 are wounded in a shooting spree at Fort Hood, Texas.

The shooter has been identified as Major Malik Nadal Hasan, and there are two others in custody.

Say a prayer for the survivors and the families of all the victims.

Hot Air has a lot more details.


UPDATE 11/6/09: More details are out now and I’m going not very far out on a limb to take the question mark out of my original heading for this post. Michelle Malkin has tons more information than I’m capable of generating in the brief time allotted to me here. I first want to correct the shooter’s name. It’s Nadal Malik Hasan, not Malik Nidal Hasan as was first reported yesterday.

This is a terrible event, and I urge everyone within the sight of this blog to stop and say a prayer for the survivors and the families of the victims. I don’t really want to make political hay out of this, but this must be said: President Obama’s immediate reaction to the shooting went beyond shameful. It may have been the single most tone deaf political moment I’ve ever seen. As Americans are reeling in shock Obama took to the airwaves and spoke for two and a half minutes about the Tribal Conference he had been involved in during the day. Smiles, a “shout out,” and light banter about a singularly unimportant piece of politics before addressing the massacre at Fort Hood. Here it is, and it’s unbelievably repellent:

A child in a man’s suit. This is political idiocy on a stratospheric level.

As more reports and information come out about the shooter’s Islamic beliefs, including reports that he was shouting “Allah ahkbar!” while shooting, it’s clear to me that this was a terrorist attack on native soil, at the heart of an army base. Whether Hasan had any ties to foreign nationals or al-Qaeda or whether he was just a lone wolf, remain question marks. Now for the big question: Will the President or his lickspittles in the media use the “T” word? Or will this go down as just another unfortunate man-caused disaster?


Would You Like Some Cheese With That Whine?

November 5, 2009

For the love of God, will you please stop whining about George Bush? It’s your administration now, for better or worse.