Believing Barack Or Your Own Lying Eyes, Part 2

August 6, 2009

Over at The Corner, Jonah Goldberg posts this video:

This is your America, my friends. Fight to keep it. Contact your representatives and let them know: NO PUBLIC OPTION.


UPDATE: Meanwhile, the Hot Air folks are running this RNC ad:

I think this is a good ad. I’m not quite as positive on it as Hot Air is, but that’s because this whole thing has me so riled up I want more red meat. But taking myself out of the equation, I think the ad hits the right notes. Humor is a much more devastating weapon than the heavy-handed mockery the Left is notorious for spouting, and the ad makes the points with a nice, light touch, especially compared to the shrill, raving nuttiness of the DNC’s ad (also posted on Hot Air with the great headline: “Mobs of Right-Wing Lunatics Want To Feast On Your Flesh“):


Reason Finds Fishmongers

August 5, 2009

The folks over at Reason have discovered a provider of “fishy” information about health care reform. Shockingly, it’s one of their own, but they didn’t let that stop them from doing their duty as Good Citizens and turning him in:


Rat Patrol, Obama-Style

August 5, 2009

The Administration has responded to the You Tube videos that are currently making the rounds showing Obama in his days before the Presidency advocating a single-payer system. They have posted a video that puts the comments “in context.” Of course, the video is an hour long so nobody except the terminally bored will watch the entire thing. They then show a current video where Obama lies through his teeth about not wanting a single-payer system.

But what’s interesting here is this paragraph:

There is a lot of disinformation about health insurance reform out there, spanning from control of personal finances to end of life care. These rumors often travel just below the surface via chain emails or through casual conversation. Since we can’t keep track of all of them here at the White House, we’re asking for your help. If you get an email or see something on the web about health insurance reform that seems fishy, send it to flag@whitehouse.gov.

Now, I’m reasonably sure that they don’t mean any harm here. They’re likely looking to collect the arguments against health care reform so that they can then spin out a rebuttal. But that paragraph looks an awful lot like they’re asking folks to drop a dime on people who send emails against health care reform, or who post things to web sites. Like bloggers. Like…gulp…me.

I can’t help but wonder what the outcry from the Left would have been if the Bush Administration had posted something on the White House web site asking people to email them if they heard “something fishy” from people opposed to the Iraq War. There would have been cries of “Enemies List!” and “McCarthyism!” The Kooky Kos Kids would have demanded an investigation and the immediate repeal of the Patriot Act. The nutjobs at Democratic Underground would have somehow tied it into the government conspiracy to bring down the World Trade Towers. Harry Reid would have taken to the floor of the Senate and told the world that he was “troubled.”

The Right, having more of a sense of humor than the Left, is taking a different tack. Michelle Malkin snitched on herself. I plan on doing so, also, letting them know that they won’t take me alive. Tevi Troy at The Corner on NRO advocates the same. Hot Air posts a list of questions for you to ask at the next Town Hall meeting. Allahpundit suggests sending messages like: “Barack Obama was once caught on video singing the praises of single-payer health care.”

This isn’t the first time the Obama administration has shown a certain ham-handedness on the Web. The Web site for the Cash For Clunkers program originally had this gem of legal-ese on it:

Any or all uses of this system, any or all uses of this system and all files on this system may be intercepted, monitored, recorded, copied, audited, inspected, and disclosed to authorized CARS, DOT, and law enforcement personnel as well as all authorized officials of other agencies, both domestic and foreign. By using this system, the user consents to such interception, monitoring, recording, copying, auditing, inspecting and disclosure at the discretion of CARS or the DOT personnel.

The paragraph has been removed from the Web site after Glenn Beck brought it to light, but what this paragraph clearly says is that by signing onto this Web site, the government is legally allowed to access anything and everything on your computer.

As with the snitch patrol advocated on the health care page, I doubt that this paragraph was written with any sort of devious intention. Most likely it was just some overheated lawyer trying to cover imaginary bases.

Here is the situation: either the Administration really does want total access to your computer and wants you to rat out your friend who’s opposed to health care reform, or they aren’t. If they aren’t, they should be more careful with what they write. If they are, we’ve got a whole other problem here.


UPDATE: Here’s the text of the email I sent to flag@whitehouse.gov:

There’s some crazy-ass blogger out there who posted a video wherein President Barack Obama seems to be advocating a single-payer system! You can find it here: https://blaknsam.wordpress.com/2009/08/03/who-will-you-believe-on-health-care-reform-barack-obama-or-your-own-lying-eyes/ He also posted a link to other videos here: https://blaknsam.wordpress.com/2009/08/03/more-videos-on-health-care-reform/. He even tried to OVERTHROW THE GOVERNMENT by providing alternative solutions to the health care crisis here: https://blaknsam.wordpress.com/2009/07/23/healthcare-problems-and-solutions/ and accuses President Barack Obama of using SCARE TACTICS here: https://blaknsam.wordpress.com/2009/07/30/the-obama-straw-man/

This guy should be arrested immediately, but a crazy guy like this won’t be taken alive!

Peace and love under Barack,

UPDATE II: Also, Brutally Honest has the details on Operation Go Flag Yourself.


You So Obama!

August 4, 2009

Professor Pamela Munro and her UCLA students put together a “slang” dictionary every four years. They compile all the latest and greatest example of pimply hyperbole that those kooky kids of today are saying. Latest entries include the usual IM and email abbreviations, like “IDK” for “I Don’t Know.”

Also included in the dictionary is the word “Obama.” Apparently it means “cool,” as in “You so obama!” I guess grammar isn’t something that’s making the rounds in UCLA.

I can’t help but wonder what the definition of “obama” will be when the next volume comes out in four years.


Why So Serious?

August 3, 2009

Well, we knew he was a smoker and a midnight toker, so we probably shouldn’t be surprised at this. Making the rounds in Los Angeles:

ObamasocialismJoker

H/T: The American Thinker and Atlas Shrugs.


UPDATE: I’m starting to see some criticism of this coming from the Left. The accusation is that it’s racist to paint a black man up in white face. I will say that the race angle on this is something that I flat out do not see. Maybe it’s because I don’t view these things through the prism of race, or maybe I’m just obtuse, but I don’t see a racial component here. I’m not really sure what I do see. My initial take on it was that it was calling out Obama as a socialist joker (which he is). Unless someone can prove to me that this was some backhanded racist insult, that’s the meaning I’m sticking with.

Putting a white man in black face was done to give whites a routine with which to pantomime and mock blacks. Putting someone in white face is designed to do what, exactly? If it’s racist, is it racist against whites? Is the criticism implied here that Obama is “acting white” (which is usually a criticism coming from the Left directed at black conservatives)? Perhaps the criticism is that Obama is a Socialist mime? Putting black face on a picture of George Bush or Bill Clinton can be construed as racist. The intent behind making up a black man to look like a villain from the number 4 highest-grossing movie of all time is much less clear.

UPDATE II: Allahpundit takes the L.A. Weekly to task for their criticism and Michelle Malkin reminds us of when it was cool to demonize the President.