Sarah Palin’s Resignation

July 6, 2009

I’ve been away for a week, hiding out from the forces of the Clampdown, and made a promise to myself that I would spend a full eight days not reading newspapers or watching TV. I’m still trying to catch up with everything that happened last week, but clearly the Sarah Palin story is a big one.

Palin’s resignation from the Governor’s chair stunned everyone. The press conference was hastily called and the announcement was made with no prior warning signs. The big question is, “Why?”

The short answer is that I don’t know. The only people who really know are her family. Of course the smear merchants on the Left are insinuating that it’s because there’s a huge scandal about to explode with her name on it and that the FBI is launching an investigation into her. The FBI denies it. I must confess that this thought did cross my mind, as well. The last time a governor called a press conference this quickly was when South Carolina’s Mark Sanford admitted that he had a gal in the Argentinian mountains, or when New York’s own Eliot Spitzer admitted to consorting with a hooker (sorry, at those prices she’s an escort). Or perhaps my favorite, when New Jersey’s Jim McGreevy did his “I’m a gay American!” press conference. Now that was a keeper. Good times, good times.

Palin’s supporters maintain that she’s laying the groundwork to run for President in 2012. If this is true, this seems an odd way of doing it. One of the knocks against Palin was her inexperience. It was always a cheap rap, especially in light of our Community-Organizer-in-Chief’s brief resume, but it seemed to stick for some reason. It seems to me that finishing your term and being the best damn governor Alaska’s ever had would improve your chances of becoming President.

I don’t believe that Palin will ever be President. The way the Left attacked and smeared her left an indelible impression in the minds of many swing voters. It was grossly unfair. Palin’s a smart, self-made woman. Her policy expertise was lacking in some areas, especially foreign policy, but no more so than Barack Obama’s (remember, Obama picked Biden to shore up his inexperience in foreign policy). But the precedent to remember here is Dan Quayle. The fact is that Quayle was the smart one on the Bush/Quayle ticket and was considered one of the most knowledgable experts in foreign policy in the Senate. But the media blasted him as a dummy who couldn’t spell “potato” and the image stuck. Quayle was never able to overcome that calumny because every time he stuck his neck out the media dragged out the old lies and distortions one more time. The same will be true of Palin. It’s not fair, of course, but Palin will be remembered not as the self-assured woman who gave a great speech at the Republican convention, but as a caricature voiced by Tina Fey. Staying in Alaska out of the media’s eye, doing a great job, and studying the issues would have helped her out more in 2012 than jetting all over the country giving speeches now.

Of course, the other possibility is that she’s tired of the lies, the attacks, and the constant smears by her political enemies and wants out of the game. If that’s the case, I wish her well and hope she and her family have a long and wonderful life together, but I can’t say that I blame her.

The Left hates this woman with a passion the likes of which I have never before witnessed. My personal opinion is that they dislike her and want to see her defeated because of her politics, but they hate her because she didn’t have the common decency to abort her Down Syndrome child. Sarah Palin is a refutation of everything the Left stands for. Unlike Hillary Clinton, Palin made it on her name, not her husband’s. She should be a feminist icon, and would be if she believed in higher taxes and abortion on demand. But she believes in lower taxes, and wouldn’t even abort that little retard. In fact, she even seems to think that little Trig Palin’s life actually has some value, that silly know-nothing! Doesn’t she understand that this is in direct opposition to groups like Planned Parenthood, which was founded to cut down the numbers of little retards and black babies.

Like Clarence Thomas on race, Sarah Palin has strayed off the reservation, and she must be punished for her transgressions.

Whatever plans she has, I wish her well.



Shortly after I wrote this, I found this absolutely revolting piece via a link from “Why Mommy Is A Republican.” It was taken off the Huffington Post, but preserved for the history books by Michelle Malkin.

It appears that my theory about the Left’s hatred of Palin isn’t as lonely as it appeared (to me, at least). I also found this posting on Mommy’s site.


Euthanasia, Government-Style

June 25, 2009

So it turns out that the ABC Barack Obama special was an infomercial after all. In it, he admitted that costs can be controlled by just letting old, sick people die. From the LA Times:

President Obama suggested at a town hall event Wednesday night that one way to shave medical costs is to stop expensive and ultimately futile procedures performed on people who are about to die and don’t stand to gain from the extra care.

Translation: If Dad is critically ill and elderly, but you want him to be around for a few more months, maybe long enough to see his first grandchild born, or perhaps long enough to watch you get married, a crack panel of government experts will look at an actuarial chart, determine that the surgery or medicine that could extend his life may not be worth it, and withhold care.

Quoth Obama:

“Maybe you’re better off not having the surgery, but taking the painkiller.”

Obama said he has personal familiarity with such a dilemma. His grandmother, Madelyn Dunham, was diagnosed with terminal cancer and given less than nine months to live, he said.

She fell and broke her hip, “and the question was, does she get hip replacement surgery, even though she was fragile enough they were not sure how long she would last?”

That may have been the question, but he didn’t tell the audience the answer.

Glad to see that the President is willing to let people die, or maybe just suffer in pain as resistance is built up to painkillers, just because they may be old and sick even though life-extending or life-enhancing procedures are available.

There’s no word from the Administration yet on whether the starving masses of people in the world will be fed with Soylent Green.


Crying For “Me Me Me” In Argentina

June 24, 2009

Well first they said he was “hiking the Appalachian trail.”

Then he arrived in the airport fresh from a trip to Argentina.

Mark Sanford, the South Carolina Governor and a Republican frequently hailed as a Presidential hopeful for 2012, vanished last week and nobody admitted to knowing where he was, including his wife and children.

Well, turns out that Sanford spent Father’s Day in the arms of his Argentinian lover.

He’s resigned his position as the chairman of the Republican Governor’s Association. This comes on the heels of John Ensign, a longtime proponent of “family values,” revealing his affair with a married staffer.

There’s no other word for it than “disgraceful.”

Michelle Malkin has a few choice words.


Nixon’s Racist Ambivalence

June 24, 2009

From the ancient history files, newly released tapes of Richard Nixon reveal his stance on abortion. When the Supreme Court ruled in Roe v. Wade, Nixon was silent. Privately, however, he expressed concern that abortion would create permissiveness.

He also had this little gem:

“There are times when an abortion is necessary. I know that. When you have a black and a white,” he told an aide, before adding, “Or a rape.”

Now, I’ve never liked Nixon. I was too young to really remember his Presidency, but from reading about it I can say that I sure wouldn’t have voted for the guy (not that I would have gone for Humphrey or McGovern, mind you). The Left will take this as an example of the evil Richard Nixon being racist and I completely agree that his comment on the propriety of aborting children born of mixed relationships is revolting on several levels, racism being only one of them.

But riddle me this: how many of those on the Left who will seize this opportunity to brand Nixon as a hateful racist will acknowledge that his views are considerably more moderate than the views of Hillary Clinton’s hero, Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger? How many will admit that the flagship organization of the pro-choice movement was built on the philosophies of a Klan-loving eugenicist that was admired by Hitler?

What Nixon said was loathsome, but he’s in good company on the Left.


Rallies For Socialized Medicine? Don’t You Believe It

June 24, 2009

Michelle Malkin’s syndicated column today rips apart the notion that tomorrow’s planned march for socialized medicine is any kind of populist protest. Unlike, say, the Tea Parties that the media ripped. Michelle asks:

Will the ABC “All Barack Channel” News health care infomercial tell viewers about the cabal at 1825 K Street (a far Left office complex/headquarters that is the Washington DC analogue of the 1024 Elysian Fields ACORN headquarters in New Orleans, which I first reported on in August 2008)?

Will they tell viewers about the First Lady’s patient-dumping scheme?

Of course not.

Read the whole thing.