Chris Christie On The Teachers’ Union

June 5, 2010

I was extremely skeptical about Chris Christie when he was running for Governor in New Jersey. I figured he’d be better than Jon Corzine, but that bar is so low it’s practically subterranean. My skepticism was based on nothing but that he was a New Jersey politician. But the more I hear and see things like this, the more impressed I am. Now if only my home state had the guts to elect someone like this.

In my home state of New York, the Republican Party has selected the elfin Rick Lazio to run against Democrat Andrew Cuomo. I guess that’s because of the incredible campaign Lazio ran for Senate in 2000, where he managed to get 43% of the vote against a woman who had never held elected office before, whose last name was synonymous with scandal in office, and who didn’t even live in New York prior to a few months before the election. It’s going to be a long year for us New Yorkers.


The Neighborhood Bully

June 2, 2010

Back in 1983, Bob Dylan released a song called “Neighborhood Bully.” The song was an ironic statement about Israel, beset on all sides by genuine enemies who wish for its extermination, hounded by the United Nations, virtually alone in the community of nations. It is stunning that a nation that is the target of terrorist nation-states, a country that is bombed almost daily by their neighboring countries, is considered the bad guy in much of the world when all they are doing is trying to survive.

The neighborhood bully, he just lives to survive
He’s criticized and condemned for being alive
He’s not supposed to fight back, he’s supposed to have thick skin
He’s supposed to lay down and die when his door is kicked in
He’s the neighborhood bully

Preach on, Brother Zimmerman.

The latest example of this is the near universal condemnation of Israel for the incident that took place on a ship carrying humanitarian aid to Gaza. The Gaza strip is controlled by the terrorist thugs of Hamas, an “organization” that is devoted to the eradication of Israel and the death of Jews. Both Israel and Egypt have imposed a blockade on Gaza to prevent other nations from supplying arms and ammunition to Hamas. Humanitarian aid, such as medical supplies, clothing, etc. is allowed to go into Gaza through various checkpoints, but any aid is first screened for weapons. As far as Israel is concerned, this is a matter of survival. Even Egypt agrees, since the embargo also includes the Gaza/Egypt border.

So when a ship from Turkey carrying what it claimed was humanitarian aid for Gaza made clear their intention to disregard the blockade, the Israeli military became extremely suspicious. There was no way to know what was on board. Was it food? Medical supplies? Weapons? Those on board the ship refused to cooperate by allowing Israel to come on board and see what was being shipped.

Faced with no real choice, the Israeli military sent a team to board the ship. The men were equipped with pistols as sidearms, but their primary weapons were decidedly non-lethal paintball guns. Still, as the men landed on the ship they were besieged by humanitarians carrying knives, metal rods, chairs and whatever other weapons were handy. The Israeli soldiers were set upon, beaten, and stabbed. One was thrown overboard.

The Israelis responded correctly. In fear for their lives, they laid down the paintball guns and went for their sidearms. Nine of these “humanitarians” were killed in self-defense.

As sure as Niagara falls, the United Nations immediately came out and accused Israel of being the bad guy. The Turkish prime minister described the Israeli action as “inhuman state terror” while the Palestinian chief peace negotiator Saeb Erakat was the first anti-Semite on the block to yell “war crime.” Even the Brits are now saying that the blockade is “unacceptable.” Perhaps allowing the free flow of weapons into Gaza would be more in keeping with British notions of political decorum.

The Obama Administration is trying to strike a non-judgemental tone. America “deeply regrets the loss of life and injuries” that occurred in the “tragedy.” But in typical fashion, the Administration is also engaging in the moral equivalence arguments that it loves. P.J. Crowley, a spokesman for the State Department supported an Israeli investigation into the incident, but also called for opening up Gaza to humanitarian aid. Unacknowledged is the fact that Israel already allows any humanitarian aid to go through to Gaza. Crowley did, at least, condemn Hamas for complicating any efforts to give aid to Gaza.

If the Administration can manage to put the moral equivalency nonsense aside and come down strongly in support of Israel, it will go a long way towards repairing the damage the Administration has done to our relationship with the only real friend we have in that region of the world. It will also be an act of genuine political courage from an Administration and a President that has yet to display much of that particular virtue.


A Teachable Moment For Malia

May 30, 2010

This past Thursday, President Obama gave his first press conference in nearly a year and received a lot of questions about the Administration’s response to the disastrous oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico.

In his typical style, the President managed to blame British Petroleum (correctly?), the Bush administration (incorrectly, but by now it’s a verbal tic), and to insist that he (the President) is on top of the entire situation and that he is in control of the response. To highlight the emotional gravity of the situation, he told the press corps how his daughter Malia came to him and asked “Did you plug the hole yet, Daddy?

When I woke this morning and I’m shaving and Malia knocks on my bathroom door and she peeks in her head and she says, “Did you plug the hole yet, Daddy?” Because I think everybody understands that when we are fouling the Earth like this, it has concrete implications not just for this generation, but for future generations.

I grew up in Hawaii where the ocean is sacred. And when you see birds flying around with oil all over their feathers and turtles dying, that doesn’t just speak to the immediate economic consequences of this; this speaks to how are we caring for this incredible bounty that we have.

And so sometimes when I hear folks down in Louisiana expressing frustrations, I may not always think that they’re (sic) comments are fair; on the other hand, I probably think to myself, these are folks who grew up fishing in these wetlands and seeing this as an integral part of who they are — and to see that messed up in this fashion would be infuriating.

So the thing that the American people need to understand is that not a day goes by where the federal government is not constantly thinking about how do we make sure that we minimize the damage on this, we close this thing down, we review what happened to make sure that it does not happen again.

I can certainly understand where Malia is coming from. Her father is the most powerful man in the world when you get right down to it, and she’s only 11 years old. But this was, as the President has been known to say, a “teachable moment” for his daughter, and for the President himself.

The oil spill in the Gulf is an environmental catastrophe. Oil is pouring out of a hole in the ocean floor and creating an enormous amount of damage to the immediate eco-system, as well as obliterating the livelihoods of those Gulf residents who make their living as fishermen. The financial cost of this will likely run into the billions, and the environmental impact is staggering. What President Obama needs to understand, and what he should have told Malia, is that there isn’t anything the Federal Government of the United States can do about it at this time.

That isn’t to say that the Federal Government plays no role here. In a very real sense, this is a defense of our nation and the Feds do play an important part. But when it comes to “plugging the hole,” the Federal Government, for all of its trillions of dollars and millions of employees, is useless. Unless the President can somehow recruit Aquaman to join the ranks of the Administration, the government is powerless when it comes to stopping the leak.

The Left keeps insisting that conservatives are saying that this is “Obama’s Katrina,” but I think most of that talk is coming from those who believe in an all-powerful government. Conservatives…at least the ones that I read and with whom I speak…understand that the oil leak is not Barack Obama’s fault and that the government is not responsible for plugging the leak. I assume that Barack Obama also knows this, which is why I find it so odd that he keeps insisting otherwise.

The Federal government’s role in all of this is to give whatever help it can to the Gulf states to prevent the oil from washing up on shore. That may mean using the Army Corps of Engineers to create sand berms that will act as a natural blockade. It may mean something else entirely. And this is where President Obama is, in fact, failing. When Louisiana governor Bobby Jindal said that he wanted to create sand berms he got held up in a Federal bureaucracy as the government told him that he could not build the barriers until they had completed an “environmental impact” assessment. Are they kidding? Millions of gallons of oil are heading towards the shore and we need to see if creating some sand bars might harm the environment? This is government at its worst: slow, ineffective, bound by red tape. Obama should tell Jindal that he has the green light to do whatever is effective and we’ll worry about the red tape later. “Need men? Here’s the National Guard. Need underwater help? Let’s bring in the Navy. Would a submarine be useful? Here you go.”

Short of providing that type of help, the simple truth remains that our government is not all-powerful. There are things that happen in this world that the government can not prevent, nor turn back. What happened on that oil rig was a horrible accident and maybe there are ways of preventing this type of accident from ever happening again. But there are no ways of preventing some other type of accident from happening. Accidents happen and sometimes people are to blame because they cut corners or were inattentive to warning signs. The time for determining whether British Petroleum is at fault for the accident, as distinct from being responsible for the effects, will come. In the meantime, Obama should tell his daughter that there are many aspects of life that the President simply can not control, that he is willing to give whatever help BP or the Gulf states need to stop this mess but that, in the end, he must leave the effort in the hands of those who have the skills to do the job. Yes, BP has failed so far, but we are in uncharted waters. When you need to stop an oil leak a mile below the surface of the Gulf of Mexico, you need to call in those companies that have the knowledge of the subject and the equipment to do the work. The last people you should call are politicians.


Everybody Draw Mohammed Day

May 20, 2010

Today is “Everybody Draw Mohammed Day.” Unfortunately, I can’t draw worth a darn, so I’ll be passing on this particular event. But that doesn’t mean I can’t post this:

For those curious, here’s a link to the movie Fitna. Memo to Eric Holder: You really should watch this.


What Last Night’s Elections Really Mean

May 19, 2010

The spinmeisters on all sides are out in force today with their ruminations on the meanings of last night’s elections, but that doesn’t mean there aren’t legitimate things we can take away from the results.

  • President Obama is now 0-for-4. Obama would be more than happy with Joe Sestak in the Senate, but it was Arlen Specter for whom the President stuck out his neck. When added to the Virginia and New Jersey gubernatorial elections from last year, and Scott Brown’s stunning upset in Massachusetts earlier this year, Obama has a perfect track record of supporting losers. It’s true that Obama distanced himself from Specter when it looked like Sestak would win the Pennsylvania primary, but his support for Specter was clear and strong, right down to offering Joe Sestak a job in order to get him to drop out of the race. Sestak’s win doesn’t hurt Obama, but it further points out that the President’s coattails are non-existent.
  • The Tea Party is a major player. In Kentucky the conservative son of libertarian Rep. Ron Paul, an eye doctor who had never run for public office, defeated the hand-picked GOP heir to Jim Bunning’s Senate seat. Trey Grayson had the support of almost every major Republican and is by all accounts a conservative. However, the Tea Party backed Rand Paul, who is more libertarian than Grayson but less libertarian than his father. The more conservative political neophyte beat the GOP favorite, and the reason is the Tea Party.
  • The special election doesn’t really tell us what the Democrat spinners are saying it tells us. The word on the street is that the Democrats are relieved that Democrat Mark Critz defeated Republican Tim Burns. The Dems feel that this bodes well for November, that the Republicans are not an unstoppable electoral machine. While they may be right about that, the special election for the seat formerly held by the late corruptocrat John Murtha isn’t exactly indicative of future results. For starters, it’s a heavily Democratic district, even though they tend to be Reagan Democrats. Secondly, there was a Democratic Senatorial Primary which naturally led more Dems to come out and vote than Republicans. Thirdly, that House seat had been the resting place of a Democratic derriere for almost 40 years. I think it would have been a major upset had Burns won, but the odds were stacked so heavily against him that it’s neither surprising nor a “lesson” that he lost. The fact that he came within shouting distance should be a warning for Dems.
  • Your Senate votes will count against you. Down in Arkansas, Blanche Lincoln learned that her votes for bailouts and Obamacare carried a price even among Democrats. A year ago Blanche Lincoln was considered a shoo-in to get re-elected in 2010. But that was before she vacillated on Obamacare, eventually voting in favor of bringing the bill to the Senate floor. Result: she failed to get 50% in the primary and now has to face a runoff election. She will probably win the runoff, but her Senate seat is now considered to be leaning Republican.
  • The “anti-incumbent” crowd are missing the point. There’s much talk about how the voters are fed up with “business as usual” in D.C. and how no incumbent is safe. Even Republicans are worried about this, as seen in the primary defeat of Republican Senator Bob Bennett in Utah. I think the “anti-incumbent” argument is more of an attempt at rationalization by politicians of both parties who are now being haunted by their previous votes. Bob Bennett did not lose in Utah because he was an incumbent. He lost because he voted for TARP and the bailout culture. Blanche Lincoln is not fighting for her political life because voters are sick of her face. She’s fighting because of her votes for bailouts and Obamacare. Arlen Specter did not lose because he’d been in his seat too long. He lost because he was rightly seen as a career opportunist who would do anything and say anything to keep his seat. Incumbency is not the problem. How you behaved in office is the problem. It is increasingly clear that on the major issues of the past few years—TARP, auto bailouts, bank bailouts, Obamacare—a vote in favor of more government and more spending is a vote against you in the election. Incumbents who can run on standing up to Leviathan have nothing to worry about.