Kim Jong-il Dying?

July 13, 2009

According to the British newspaper The Guardian, the South Korean media is reporting that North Korean dictator Kim Jong-il has pancreatic cancer.

Am I a bad person to think that this is the best news I’ve heard in months? Is that wrong?


Porkulus II: The Next Day; UPDATED

July 10, 2009

Michelle Malkin’s been on fire recently. Her syndicated column today is a neat evisceration of the stimulus package that was guaranteed to keep unemployment below 8% (currently at 9.5%).

The first stimulus package was nothing more than a fiscal boondoggle designed to pay off political cronies like the unions and areas that voted for Obama (H/T: Around The Sphere) and was loaded down with some of the most ridiculous pork projects ever seen.

Expectations for a second round of stimulus are for more of the same. The fact is that Obama isn’t particularly interested in stimulating the economy. If he was, he would be slashing taxes across the board, loosening regulations on industry and corporations, cutting the capital gains tax, and balancing the Federal budget. I’ve noticed that whenever Obama says, “We don’t want to do this…” then it’s time to hang onto your wallet. If he didn’t want to do these things, he wouldn’t.

Obama’s straw man is that there are only two options: his way, or doing nothing at all. He says it every time he speaks. “There are those who want to do nothing…” What crap.

There are time-tested and proven methods of getting ourselves out of a bad economy. What these methods boil down to is simply this: put more money in the hands of the people who earn the money.

Government has no money of it’s own. One hundred percent of the revenue government uses comes from taxpayers. This is why the stimulus package, and the subsequent stimulus packages (look for Porkulus III: Revenge Of The Bureaucrat within a few months of Porkulus II), will not work. The premise behind them is that in order to put money into the economy, they first must take money out of the economy. It’s why government attempts to stimulate the economy through direct action, rather than by letting people and the free market decide how to spend their own money, are doomed to failure.

If the definition of insanity is repeating the same action over and over again while expecting a different result, then it is time to haul the Democrats off to the funny farm. But then, this has never been about stimulating the economy. It has always been about changing the way the citizenry of the United States deals with the Federal Government. This is about making as many people as possible dependent on government largesse. This is about an intellectual elite who feel that you don’t know how to spend the money you earn as well as they do. The Morlocks in D.C. are trying their very best to convince the Eloi of the fifty states to follow blindly and leave the decision making and the serious thinking to the smart ones. In their hearts, they believe that we are drones, toiling to provide them with more money and more power. In return, they give us the Postal Service and promises of paradise on Earth. Well, folks, it’s all a bunch of bull. You can’t immanentize the eschaton, as Eric Voeglin said.

This is about control. Fight the power.


UPDATE: In today’s Washington Post, President Obama has an op-ed defending the stimulus. Over at The Corner, Stephen Spruiell dismantles it with ruthless efficiency.


Yes, Her Can

July 10, 2009

yeshercan2

Finally, Obama has taken a position I can get behind.

Of course the Obama shills in the mainstream media (ABC) are in full denial!

Actually the media’s having fun with this. “Yes, I Can,” “Tail To The Chief,” and other things. Personally, it does look like ABC is correct, and the full video reveals a much more innocent move on Obama’s part, but it’s Friday and we should all have a little fun with this.

Obama may be completely innocent here, but Sarkozy on the other hand looks like a real horn dog.


UPDATE: Michelle Malkin reaches the same conclusion.


On Hating Sarah

July 7, 2009

I’m still a little bit breathless from reading David Kahane’s superb column on NRO today. Preach on, brother, preach on!


Sarah Palin’s Resignation

July 6, 2009

I’ve been away for a week, hiding out from the forces of the Clampdown, and made a promise to myself that I would spend a full eight days not reading newspapers or watching TV. I’m still trying to catch up with everything that happened last week, but clearly the Sarah Palin story is a big one.

Palin’s resignation from the Governor’s chair stunned everyone. The press conference was hastily called and the announcement was made with no prior warning signs. The big question is, “Why?”

The short answer is that I don’t know. The only people who really know are her family. Of course the smear merchants on the Left are insinuating that it’s because there’s a huge scandal about to explode with her name on it and that the FBI is launching an investigation into her. The FBI denies it. I must confess that this thought did cross my mind, as well. The last time a governor called a press conference this quickly was when South Carolina’s Mark Sanford admitted that he had a gal in the Argentinian mountains, or when New York’s own Eliot Spitzer admitted to consorting with a hooker (sorry, at those prices she’s an escort). Or perhaps my favorite, when New Jersey’s Jim McGreevy did his “I’m a gay American!” press conference. Now that was a keeper. Good times, good times.

Palin’s supporters maintain that she’s laying the groundwork to run for President in 2012. If this is true, this seems an odd way of doing it. One of the knocks against Palin was her inexperience. It was always a cheap rap, especially in light of our Community-Organizer-in-Chief’s brief resume, but it seemed to stick for some reason. It seems to me that finishing your term and being the best damn governor Alaska’s ever had would improve your chances of becoming President.

I don’t believe that Palin will ever be President. The way the Left attacked and smeared her left an indelible impression in the minds of many swing voters. It was grossly unfair. Palin’s a smart, self-made woman. Her policy expertise was lacking in some areas, especially foreign policy, but no more so than Barack Obama’s (remember, Obama picked Biden to shore up his inexperience in foreign policy). But the precedent to remember here is Dan Quayle. The fact is that Quayle was the smart one on the Bush/Quayle ticket and was considered one of the most knowledgable experts in foreign policy in the Senate. But the media blasted him as a dummy who couldn’t spell “potato” and the image stuck. Quayle was never able to overcome that calumny because every time he stuck his neck out the media dragged out the old lies and distortions one more time. The same will be true of Palin. It’s not fair, of course, but Palin will be remembered not as the self-assured woman who gave a great speech at the Republican convention, but as a caricature voiced by Tina Fey. Staying in Alaska out of the media’s eye, doing a great job, and studying the issues would have helped her out more in 2012 than jetting all over the country giving speeches now.

Of course, the other possibility is that she’s tired of the lies, the attacks, and the constant smears by her political enemies and wants out of the game. If that’s the case, I wish her well and hope she and her family have a long and wonderful life together, but I can’t say that I blame her.

The Left hates this woman with a passion the likes of which I have never before witnessed. My personal opinion is that they dislike her and want to see her defeated because of her politics, but they hate her because she didn’t have the common decency to abort her Down Syndrome child. Sarah Palin is a refutation of everything the Left stands for. Unlike Hillary Clinton, Palin made it on her name, not her husband’s. She should be a feminist icon, and would be if she believed in higher taxes and abortion on demand. But she believes in lower taxes, and wouldn’t even abort that little retard. In fact, she even seems to think that little Trig Palin’s life actually has some value, that silly know-nothing! Doesn’t she understand that this is in direct opposition to groups like Planned Parenthood, which was founded to cut down the numbers of little retards and black babies.

Like Clarence Thomas on race, Sarah Palin has strayed off the reservation, and she must be punished for her transgressions.

Whatever plans she has, I wish her well.



Shortly after I wrote this, I found this absolutely revolting piece via a link from “Why Mommy Is A Republican.” It was taken off the Huffington Post, but preserved for the history books by Michelle Malkin.

It appears that my theory about the Left’s hatred of Palin isn’t as lonely as it appeared (to me, at least). I also found this posting on Mommy’s site.