Can You Hear Us Now?

November 4, 2009

I guess Cousin Pookie couldn’t be bothered to vote.

The spinners are in overdrive today on both sides of the aisle. The Republicans are claiming that happy days are here again and that 2009 is a clear indicator that the Republicans will take back the House and Senate in 2010. The Democrats are saying, “Election? Was there an election yesterday? It must have been tiny and insignificant.”

Advantage: Republicans!

The most important races from a national perspective yesterday were the Gubernatorial elections in Virginia and New Jersey. Democrats had written off Virginia several weeks ago when the handwriting was clearly on the wall, but even they couldn’t have predicted that Republican Bob McDonnell would crush his Democratic opponent Creigh Deeds by a wopping 18%. That’s not just a defeat, that’s the Democrat going down like the Hindenburg. Oh, the humanity of it all.

The spin from the Dems is that Creigh Deeds was a weak candidate who foolishly declined to follow the advice of that oracle of campaign wisdom, Barack Obama. He lost, say the Dems, because he failed to sufficiently embrace Obama.

(Insert eyeroll here.)

But then there’s that pesky New Jersey race. Not only did Jon Corzine embrace Obama, he was seen at several campaign events practically humping the President’s leg. New Jersey is one of the bluest of blue states, and Corzine one of the bluest of blue candidates. The President made several trips to New Jersey to sprinkle some of the same magic he used with the Olympic Committee, and Corzine actually ran attack ads comparing Chris Christie’s policies to those of the Democratic Devil, George W. Bush. If that’s not singing from Obama’s hymnal, I don’t know what is. Corzine offered a full-throated endorsement of all things Barack, and Barack returned the favor.

Far from the squeaker contest envisioned by so many, Chris Christie won by 5%. This in a state that Obama won by something like 17% (going on memory here, so don’t quote me). In New Jersey, for a Democrat to win by 5% it’s a tight contest. For a Republican to win by the same amount, it’s about a 9 on the Richter scale.

The other race that garnered national attention, the special election in District 23 of New York, went to the Democrat. The Dems are trumpeting this as a major victory. Nancy Pelosi is claiming last night was a victory for the Democrats, which makes her the Baghdad Bob of the House of Representatives. But this particular election was at least a moral victory for conservatives. Recall that the Republican candidate, Dede Scozzafava, was an extremely liberal Republican who was handpicked by a star chamber of town officials. She was at least as far to the Left as the Democrat, Bill Owens. The third candidate, the Independent Doug Hoffman, was clearly conservative. He was also, clearly, unknown only one month ago when his poll numbers were in single digits. But in the past month, overcoming idiotic endorsements by Newt Gingrich and the Republican National Committee, the conservative not only caught up to the Republican but forced her out of the race. He lost to the Democrat in the final tally, but the Republican still managed to siphon off about 5% of the vote even though she was no longer running. Put that in perspective: a conservative candidate with no name recognition came from nowhere in one month and beat the liberal Republican and came close to beating the Democrat in the general election. Call it spin if you want, but I’m claiming a moral victory.

Then there are races closer to home. In heavily Democratic Westchester County, New York, County Executive Andy Spano (seeking his fourth term) lost in a stunning upset to conservative Republican Rob Astorino, a loss foreseen by no one. In very liberal Maine, gay marriage was defeated at the polls. In my own hometown, there was a Republican sweep of the local offices, nearly all of which had been held by Democrats.

The Republicans are still a long, long way from reclaiming the House, Senate, and Presidency. Deservedly so, I might add. They have no one to blame for these years in the wilderness except themselves. But last night was a clear shot across the bow for the Democrats in D.C. Blue Dog Democrats in conservative districts will need to seriously think again before hitching their cart to Pelosi’s and Reid’s horse. Even Democrats in marginally Democratic districts will need to reconsider whether or not they want cap-and-trade or continued employment. It’s the “independents” who decide these races, and in both Virginia and New Jersey the independents went two-to-one in favor of the guys promising less government.

During the summer the Administration and the Democrats tried to marginalize the Tea Party movement as a mob of crazies who shouldn’t be listened to. Well, folks, can you hear us now?

Hot Air has lessons from Election Night, an Election Recap, and thoughts on the Gay Marriage vote in Maine. Michelle Malkin has an appropriate warning to the Republican establishment about the lessons they should take away from District 23.


Danson’s Deep Thoughts

November 3, 2009

Two liberals sittin’ around chatting and thinking deep thoughts…

To me the big reveal here is not Ted Danson’s condescending view of Rush Limbaugh, it’s everything else he and Joy Behar say. Danson bemoans the idea that people like Rush Limbaugh and the “Religious Right” are exploiting the fear of average people. In a longer version of the video (here—for some reason I couldn’t embed it on The Clampdown) Danson implies that people only go to church because the rest of their lives are “tough”, and the ever-odious Behar solemnly agrees and further states that these “frightened” people whom Rush is manipulating are uneducated and not even aware of what’s good for them. Rush and those evil ne’er-do-wells in the Religious Right encourage people to “vote against their interests.”

And there you have Leftism in a nutshell: we know best, leave the decisions to us. You uneducated rubes don’t even know what’s good for you.

Scratch the surface of a Leftist and you will find a totalitarian core.

H/T: Big Hollywood.


Vote Local, Think National

November 3, 2009

People generally refer to elections such as the ones taking place all over America today as “off-year elections.” The implication is that it’s not as big a deal as the “on-year” elections (i.e., Federal elections).

This is, frankly, a subversion of what the Founders of this nation envisioned. To the Founding Fathers, it was local politics that was most important. The more localized the election, the louder the voice of the citizen. When the Constitution was ratified, there wasn’t even a direct election of Senators. For the Federal Government, the citizens voted for a Representative and a President. These elections were considered less important because the Founders understood that under the U.S. Constitution the powers granted to the Federal government were extremely limited. The powers of state and local governments were the most important part of the new nation.

Even today, citizens vote for a President, two Senators, and one Representative in national elections. That’s it. On a state level (and the rules can vary but this is generally true, we vote for a Governor, a state senator, and a state representative. Statewide, we also vote on referendum, amendments to state constitutions, etc. We vote for more things statewide than nationally because our voice is supposed to be louder in the state than in the Federal government.

Locally, we vote for a wide range of offices: County supervisors, town supervisors, judges, tax receivers, school boards, councilmembers, clerks, highway superintendents, etc.

Elections such as the 2009 election are not “off-year.” They are the most important elections to our daily lives. Your town supervisor and town council have much more say over your day-to-day life than Barack Obama does. The promotion of these elections as somehow being “off” is just another symptom that we as a nation are merrily walking the road to serfdom. We feel that only the Federal elections and, maybe, gubernatorial elections, are important. By feeling this way, we are bestowing more power on the portions of government in which we have the least amount of impact.

So go vote. Make your voice heard locally, and remember that the national representatives are paying attention to these local races. These are the races that illustrate the real voices of the citizens before those voices are filtered through lawyers and lobbyists.