Pants-On-Fire Pelosi Less Popular Than Vlad The Impaler

June 5, 2009

According to a new Gallup poll, the approval ratings for Nancy Pants-On-Fire Pelosi are actually lower than the approval ratings for former VP Dick Cheney.

I’m not particularly surprised by this. In fact, I don’t understand Cheney’s low ratings except to note that they are the byproduct of being portrayed as evil incarnate for the last nine years by everyone from Tom Brokaw to David Letterman.

But now Cheney is unleashed and, far from being the fire-breathing dragon of popular lore, he is coming across as the reasonable and responsible public servant he is now and always has been. Most importantly, he is being increasingly seen as an adult in a foreign policy world inhabited by obsequious and ignorant children.

Polls are what they are, of course, and they change like the wind. I try not to put too much faith in them, but these findings were just too delicious to resist. The great satisfaction in this, to me, is to know how this must be scrambling the brains of those on the Left. As far as they are concerned, this poll indicates that Snow White is less popular than Darth Vader, that Queen Victoria is somewhere below Adolf Hitler in approval ratings, and that Mother Teresa has a likability quotient below Caligula.

I wonder how they’ll react in a couple of years if St. Barry’s approval ratings drop below Bush’s?


We’re No Better Than They Are!

June 4, 2009

From the President’s speech in Cairo today:

“I reject the view of some in the West that a woman who chooses to cover her hair is somehow less equal, but I do believe that a woman who is denied an education is denied equality. And it is no coincidence that countries where women are well-educated are far more likely to be prosperous.”

“Now let me be clear: issues of women’s equality are by no means simply an issue for Islam. In Turkey, Pakistan, Bangladesh and Indonesia, we have seen Muslim-majority countries elect a woman to lead. Meanwhile, the struggle for women’s equality continues in many aspects of American life, and in countries around the world.”

I swear to God, I don’t know how much longer I’ll be able to take this. Making an outright comparison between a country where a woman finishes second in the Democratic primaries for President and countries where women are not allowed to drive or are killed because they touch men who are not their husbands is so insulting on so many levels I don’t even know what to write about it. How long is this Grovelpalooza going to last?


Obama’s Shameful Statement

June 4, 2009

Lo! and Behold! The pressure finally got to them.

The President has finally issued a statement on the shooting by a radical Muslim terrorist of Army Private William Long and Corporal Quinton Ezeagwula. The full statement:

“I am deeply saddened by this senseless act of violence against two brave young soldiers who were doing their part to strengthen our armed forces and keep our country safe. I would like to wish Quinton Ezeagwula a speedy recovery, and to offer my condolences and prayers to William Long’s family as they mourn the loss of their son.”

Now, first and foremost, I don’t for one second believe that this statement comes from the President. The President is in Egypt, apologizing for colonialism and a failure to properly understand Islam. He didn’t take time out of his schedule to craft this statement, and that’s understandable. My guess is that most of these statements are written by staff and approved by the man in charge, including the statement about the murder of George Tiller.

Nonetheless, the statement is pure Obama: mealy-mouthed, insufficient, and 100% insincere. Let’s compare this statement with the one he approved for the murder of George Tiller:

  • He is “shocked and outraged” by the murder of an abortionist. He is “saddened” by the murder of a U.S. Army private and the wounding of a Corporal. While I am glad to see his righteous anger over the shooting of Tiller, I was hoping the shooting of Long and Ezeagwula would inspire more than a frowny face.
  • The murder of Tiller is a “heinous act of violence.” The murder of Long is “senseless.” For the record, according to Webster’s dictionary this means that the murder of Tiller was “hateful, odious, abominable, or totally reprehensible” and the shooting of Long and Ezeagwula was “nonsensical” or, perhaps, “stupid or foolish” or maybe “unconscious.” Most likely, they were going for “meaningless.” Isn’t this the President who once lectured us that “words count”?
  • The Tiller statement comes complete with a paternal lecture about the need to resolve our differences. The Long/Ezeagwula statement comes with an offer of condolences.

The murder of George Tiller was a heinous act of violence, and it is rightfully deplored by people of good conscience everywhere, whether they are on the pro-life or pro-choice side of the argument. But the shooting of Private Long and Corporal Ezeagwula was far from “senseless.” It was a planned crime of hatred against the Army and against America itself by a man whose only regret seems to be that there weren’t more soliders nearby to kill. It was an act of jihad by a convert to Islam. Private Long and Corporal Ezeagwula are casualties of a war that was launched against the United States. A failure to recognize that fact, and declare the facts loudly and publicly, does not speak well of this President.

I’m glad the President is outraged by the Tiller murder. I am, too. I just wish he’d saved some outrage for those who have sworn oaths to destroy us, even if they only managed to kill one and wound another.

But then, that might not go over so well on his current Kumbaya tour of the Middle East.


Obama’s Shameful Double Standard

June 3, 2009

Within an hour of the murder of George Tiller, the Kansas doctor known as one of the leading abortionists in the country, by a domestic terrorist, President Obama issued the following statement:

“I am shocked and outraged by the murder of Dr. George Tiller as he attended church services this morning. However profound our differences as Americans over difficult issues such as abortion, they cannot be resolved by heinous acts of violence.”

Within several days of the murder of U.S. Army Private William Long and the wounding of Corporal Quinton Ezeagwula at the hands of a Muslim terrorist, President Obama drew on his unparalleled command of the English language and issued the following statement:


Obama’s Muslim America

June 3, 2009

President Obama, in the first of many attempts to suck up to the Middle Eastern nations he’s currently attempting to court with his golden tongue, has declared America to be one of the largest Muslim countries in the world.

I’m not even sure where to begin with this. First off, I suppose, is the fact that it’s not even remotely true. But that’s really sort of beside the point.

Most importantly, when one thinks of a “Muslim nation” the image that springs to mind is a nation where the citizenry is a) Muslim, and b) governed by Muslim beliefs. So far, at least, we’re not there or even approaching the runway. We may need to reassess after this grovel-fest is over, but for now it’s safe to say that if there were 200 million Muslims living in America, and America was still governed with freedom of religion and a separation between Church and state, then we would still not be a Muslim nation. We would be a nation with a large Muslim population. The single largest ethnic group in America are whites, but this is not a “White nation,” despite the handwringing of race pimps like Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson. A better case can be made to say that America is a Judeo-Christian nation because America was established as a nation of laws, and those laws were based solidly in the Judaic and Christian philosophies.

So the question becomes, “Why did Obama say this?”

I’m leaning on the idea that this guy is nowhere near as smart as we all thought he was. Clearly he’s got an amazing ability to absorb facts and data and retain them, and his skill with a prepared text is unmatched by any politician I’ve seen. But unlike Bill Clinton, who had the same abilities, I don’t really see Barack Obama as any kind of intellectual heavyweight. His ideas are really just the same lefty rhetoric that we’ve been hearing since the 1960s.

Let’s take a look at the whole interview he did with France’s Canal Plus:

  • He refers to the loss of the Air France jet as “an aviation problem.”
  • He insists that Muslims need to understand how we in the West feel about terrorism. I assume he means that we don’t want to be attacked anymore, as if he believes that Muslims thought that we were really hoping they’d kill thousands of our citizens one beautiful Tuesday morning. In the spirit of moral equivalency, he also states that the West has to “educate themselves more effectively on Islam.” Someone’s crying, Lord…come on, sing it with me! You know the words!
  • He offers really jejune statements like “those who build as opposed to those who destroy I think leave a lasting legacy,” a sentiment that is so simplistic it borders on feeble-minded and is also very debatable (so Stalin, Hitler, and Mao did not leave lasting legacies? Oh…he meant good legacies…well then, yeah, duh…unless you count things like destroying colonial rule in America, or destroying the South to free the slaves, or destroying Berlin to eradicate the Nazi movement, or destroying the Berlin Wall, or, well, never mind). It was the kind of a hollow, yet lofty, line that sounds really impressive when you’re in high school and you think your teacher is way cool.
  • He thinks that his speech and “a roundtable discussion” are the stepping off point for getting Muslim extremists to lay down their knives and relinquish control back to the pilots.
  • He says Muslim nations are making “investments in education” as if what children are being taught in many of these Wahabbi schools is not part of the problem.
  • He believes that France (!) is one of the countries leading the way on climate change and the economic recession. Well, it’s good to know that he’s taking climate advice from a country that saw thousands of people die in a heat wave in 2003 and economic advice from a Socialist country that had double-digit unemployment and anemic economic growth for years before the economic collapse.
  • When asked what he likes about France, he at least has the decency to stop and think before falling back on the food and the wine.

The entire interview should be subtitled “One President In Search Of A Teleprompter.”

But the saddest part of all of this, to me at least, is that Obama’s overseas trips from Europe to South America to the Middle East, infested with moral equivalency and mea culpas, reveal the President of the United States to be a man who is embarrassed by his own country. That is truly a shame.